Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

“You're not necessarily pregnant”: Confusion about emergency contraception

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Misconceptions about what emergency contraception does are common and have resulted in policy efforts to restrict access. Understanding the beliefs and reasoning behind people's uncertainty and lack of knowledge about emergency contraception helps shed light on key misconceptions and how advocates, providers, and researchers can improve clarity. We conducted a secondary analysis using previously collected qualitative data from card sort and vignette activities focused on scenarios related to emergency contraception and if participants considered these scenarios abortions (N = 64). We identified three major themes related to participants' classification of emergency contraception: uncertainty and pregnancy liminality; timing and mechanism of action; and the role of intention and overlap with medication abortion. Our study demonstrates that people lack a consistent, coherent understanding of what emergency contraception does, which has implications for contraceptive access and service provision. Furthermore, these misconceptions can become politicized and undergird the rationale for restrictions on sexual and reproductive health care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100678
JournalSSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2026

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Keywords

  • Emergency contraception
  • Medication abortion
  • Qualitative
  • Vignettes
  • card sort

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“You're not necessarily pregnant”: Confusion about emergency contraception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this