Abstract
Four different end-of-pipe waste-treatment processes applicable to mechanical pulp and paper manufacture were modelled. Calculated costs for an average mill were capital $34-$44 million, operating cost $3.5-$6 million/year and discounted (10 years) $60-$85 million. Compared with mill reported values, capital and operating costs of activated sludge treatment (AST) were higher by 17 and 29%, respectively; those for aerated stabilization basin (ASB) were higher by 27 and 180%. Major variables affecting the costs were BOD and TSS levels and the wastewater-to-pulp ratio. It was concluded that ASB is more economical than AST and that anaerobic treatment plus AST could be advantageous at high BOD levels.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 437-451 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1997 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Chemical Engineering
Keywords
- Economics of wastewater treatment
- Pulp and paper wastewater treatment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Optimized Design of Wastewater Treatment Systems: Application to the Mechanical Pulp and Paper Industry: I. Design and Cost Relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver