Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How Race-Conscious (Vs. Colorblind) Cues Impact White Americans’ Inter- and Intraracial Interactions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Although both inter- and intraracial conversations about race are necessary for combating racism, discrepancies in people's racial ideologies may hinder these discussions. We conducted three experiments (N = 1529) to test how White American adults on Prolific (Studies 1 and 2) and White American college students (Study 3) anticipate a conversation about race with a White or Black person who expresses a race-conscious or colorblind racial ideology. Across studies, participants interpreted a Black interaction partner's expression of colorblindness (vs. race-consciousness) as a stronger identity safety cue. In contrast, participants interpreted a White interaction partner's expression of race-consciousness (vs. colorblindness) as a stronger identity safety cue. However, participants’ internal motivation to respond without prejudice predicted more positive responses to the race-conscious ideology expression regardless of partner race. These findings highlight when White Americans are most likely to engage in race-relevant conversations necessary for anti-racist allyship.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere70066
JournalJournal of Social Issues
Volume82
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2026
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Social Sciences

Keywords

  • colorblindness
  • identity safety cues
  • interracial interactions
  • privilege
  • racial shared reality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Race-Conscious (Vs. Colorblind) Cues Impact White Americans’ Inter- and Intraracial Interactions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this