Abstract
Although both inter- and intraracial conversations about race are necessary for combating racism, discrepancies in people's racial ideologies may hinder these discussions. We conducted three experiments (N = 1529) to test how White American adults on Prolific (Studies 1 and 2) and White American college students (Study 3) anticipate a conversation about race with a White or Black person who expresses a race-conscious or colorblind racial ideology. Across studies, participants interpreted a Black interaction partner's expression of colorblindness (vs. race-consciousness) as a stronger identity safety cue. In contrast, participants interpreted a White interaction partner's expression of race-consciousness (vs. colorblindness) as a stronger identity safety cue. However, participants’ internal motivation to respond without prejudice predicted more positive responses to the race-conscious ideology expression regardless of partner race. These findings highlight when White Americans are most likely to engage in race-relevant conversations necessary for anti-racist allyship.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | e70066 |
| Journal | Journal of Social Issues |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2026 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Social Sciences
Keywords
- colorblindness
- identity safety cues
- interracial interactions
- privilege
- racial shared reality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How Race-Conscious (Vs. Colorblind) Cues Impact White Americans’ Inter- and Intraracial Interactions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver