Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An empirical investigation of the role of knowledge in public opinion about GM food

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The research presented here examines the hypothesis that the most effective way to increase public approval of GM foods is to provide education about them. To do this, a national telephone survey was conducted in the USA, which included multiple measures of knowledge about GM foods. The results indicate that all of the knowledge measures were positively related to approval, such that more knowledge was related to more approval. However, when the knowledge variables were simultaneously entered in a regression model, only one of the measures, a scale of knowledge about potentially threatening aspects of GM food, was significantly related to approval. The overall model predicted only 8% of the variance in approval, leading to the conclusion that knowledge may be just one of the many factors that influence opinions of GM food.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)178-194
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Biotechnology
Volume7
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Bioengineering
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Keywords

  • Acceptance
  • Agricultural biotechnology
  • Attitudes
  • Consumer opinion
  • Genetically modified food
  • Knowledge
  • Knowledge deficit model
  • Perceptions
  • Public opinion
  • Public understanding of science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An empirical investigation of the role of knowledge in public opinion about GM food'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this