Abstract
Accurate measurements of personal exposure to atmospheric pollutants such as ozone are important for understanding health risks. We tested a new personal ozone monitor (POM; 2B Technologies) for accuracy, precision, and ease of use. The POM's measurements were compared to simultaneous ozone measurements from a 2B Model 205 monitor and a ThermoScientific 49i monitor, and multiple POMs were placed side-by-side to check precision. Tests were undertaken in a controlled environmental facility, outdoors, and in a private residence. Additionally, ten volunteers wore a POM for five days and answered a questionnaire about its ease of use. The POM measured ozone accurately compared to the 49i ozone monitor, with average relative differences of less than 8%. In the controlled environment tests, the POM's ozone measurements did not change in the presence of additional atmospheric constituents with similar absorption lines to ozone, though there may have been a small decrease in precision and accuracy. Precision between POMs varied by environment (r2 = 0.98 outdoors; r2 = 0.3 to 0.9 in controlled lab conditions). Volunteers reported that the POM was reasonably comfortable to wear, although all reported that they felt that it was too noisy. Overall, the POM is a viable option for personal ozone monitoring.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 120-126 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Atmospheric Environment |
| Volume | 175 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2018 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Environmental Science
- Atmospheric Science
Keywords
- Exposure
- Ozone
- Personal monitoring
- Sensor evaluation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy and practicality of a portable ozone monitor for personal exposure estimates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver