Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Accuracy and practicality of a portable ozone monitor for personal exposure estimates

  • Jessica A. Sagona
  • , Clifford P. Weisel
  • , Qingyu Meng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Accurate measurements of personal exposure to atmospheric pollutants such as ozone are important for understanding health risks. We tested a new personal ozone monitor (POM; 2B Technologies) for accuracy, precision, and ease of use. The POM's measurements were compared to simultaneous ozone measurements from a 2B Model 205 monitor and a ThermoScientific 49i monitor, and multiple POMs were placed side-by-side to check precision. Tests were undertaken in a controlled environmental facility, outdoors, and in a private residence. Additionally, ten volunteers wore a POM for five days and answered a questionnaire about its ease of use. The POM measured ozone accurately compared to the 49i ozone monitor, with average relative differences of less than 8%. In the controlled environment tests, the POM's ozone measurements did not change in the presence of additional atmospheric constituents with similar absorption lines to ozone, though there may have been a small decrease in precision and accuracy. Precision between POMs varied by environment (r2 = 0.98 outdoors; r2 = 0.3 to 0.9 in controlled lab conditions). Volunteers reported that the POM was reasonably comfortable to wear, although all reported that they felt that it was too noisy. Overall, the POM is a viable option for personal ozone monitoring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)120-126
Number of pages7
JournalAtmospheric Environment
Volume175
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Environmental Science
  • Atmospheric Science

Keywords

  • Exposure
  • Ozone
  • Personal monitoring
  • Sensor evaluation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy and practicality of a portable ozone monitor for personal exposure estimates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this